Post by ZwiebelHello,
is there a way to shut down Tor relays for a short time without losing
consensus weight or bandwidth?
This is a frequently asked question, particularly if you add "losing flags" to the relay operator's list of concerns.
I wonder if it's worth adding a FAQ or wiki entry with potential answers:
It takes time:
* wait, and the authorities and bandwidth authorities will re-assess your relay over about a week;
* clients may have given up on you as a guard, and may not come back for several months;
The network is dynamic:
* if the network is growing, your relay's share is going to be lower over time;
* if the network is not using its full relay capacity, this is good, because packets travel faster;
* (it's also good because sudden increases can be absorbed without impacting existing users);
We make bug fixes and add features:
* we recently fixed a bug where a relay would submit a descriptor with an 0 DirPort when it restarted (0.2.7.7 [unreleased], 0.2.8.1-alpha);
* in 0.2.8, network load is moved from the authorities to fallback directory mirrors, please opt-in if your relay is stable;
* in 0.2.8, network load is moved from directory mirrors with DirPorts, to almost all relays via tunnelled directory connections.
Depending on your relay's role in the network, it might see more or less traffic with these changes.
Post by ZwiebelLast week I installed a newer Tor version and added more RAM and now my
relays lost a third of their bandwidth. Last time I've upgraded the
hardware was in January and the relays didn't fully recover from the downtime
in the last two months. I'd gladly provide 200Mb/s+ of relay bandwidth if I
could, but Tor won't let me.
Networks need extra capacity - it increases average speeds, and absorbs sudden usage spikes.
Consider starting a second tor instance on other ports to use the extra capacity on your server.
Tim
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B
teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F